🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump had a cautionary message for the opposition party.

Soon he will decide what "opposition-supported departments" he would reduce and whether those reductions would be short-term or long-lasting.

He said the government shutdown, which started this week, had afforded him an "unique chance."

"Today I'm meeting with Russ Vought, known for his role in Project 2025," he posted on his social media platform on Thursday.

The Project 2025 Connection

The budget director, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, may not be widely known to the public.

But the 2025 initiative, a right-wing plan for administration put together primarily by previous administration figures like Vought when the Republicans were out of power, featured prominently during last year's presidential campaign.

The comprehensive policy guide contained suggestions for significant cuts in the federal bureaucracy, expanded presidential authority, rigorous immigration enforcement, a nationwide abortion ban and other elements of an ultra-conservative social agenda.

It was frequently touted by the Democratic candidate Kamala Harris, as Trump's "dangerous plan" for the future if he was to be elected.

At the time, seeking to reassure swing voters, the president attempted to separate himself from the proposal.

"I know nothing about the 2025 plan," the president stated in mid-2024. "I disagree with certain aspects of their proposal and some of the things they're saying are completely unreasonable and terrible."

Shifting Approach

Now, however, Trump is using the conservative blueprint as a threat to get Democrats to agree to his budgetary demands.

And he is holding up Vought, who wrote a section on the use of executive power, as a sort of financial grim reaper, prepared to make cuts to federal programs near and dear to Democrats.

In case that particular metaphor wasn't clear, on Thursday night Trump shared an computer-created spoof video on Truth Social with the director depicted as the figure of death, set to altered lyrics of Blue Oyster Cult's classic song.

Washington Responses

In Congress, Republican leaders have echoed Trump's characterisation of the director as the administration enforcer.

"We don't control what he's going to do," GOP Senate leader the senator said. "This is the risk of closing federal operations and transferring control to Russ Vought."

Senator Mike Lee of Utah told the news network that the director had been "preparing for this moment for many years."

This might be somewhat exaggerated, but Vought, who cut his teeth as a Capit Hill aide for GOP fiscal conservatives and assisted in managing the advocacy division of the Heritage Foundation, has extensive background examining the intricacies of the federal budget.

The Bean-Counter Behind the President

He served for twelve months as the deputy director of the White House budget office during Trump's first term, advancing to become its director in that year.

In contrast to numerous others who served with Trump during those first four years, Vought had staying power - and was quickly reinstalled as head of the budget office when Trump returned recently.

"Many individuals who didn't return represent an old way of thinking," said Richard Stern, a Heritage economic policy director who, like Vought, started his professional life in GOP fiscal policy networks.

"Russ was ahead of his time in the first term and perfectly positioned currently."

Although Vought isn't one to shy away from controversial statements – he previously stated that he aspired to be "the individual who dismantles the deep state" – he doesn't particularly appear the role of conservative villain.

Thinning hair and wearing glasses, with a salt-and-pepper facial hair, the director's remarks typically have the controlled rhythm of a numbers expert or professor.

He doesn't possess the narrow-eyed glower and heated language of Stephen Miller, another longtime Trump adviser who oversees White House immigration policy.

Capitalizing on Government Closure

Now Trump has threatened to deploy the director at a moment when, because of the regulatory uncertainty caused by the federal closure, their cuts might be deeper and more durable than those instituted earlier this year.

Ex-congressional leader the political veteran, a veteran of the major closure battles of the nineties, told NPR that Vought and his team have been preparing for precisely this situation while they were in the opposition period during the previous administration.

"Everyone understood a government shutdown was likely," he said. "I think they had decided early on that you're only going to get the level of transformation they want if you're determined and resolute and every chance you get, you seize the moment."

The opportunity this shutdown presents for budget-cutters like the director is that, without congressionally approved funding, the federal operations continue in a legal grey area with fewer budgetary restrictions.

The administration can, in theory, slash funding and staffing deeper than it could earlier in the year, when spending was governed by standard funding levels.

And while job eliminations would still have to abide by a 60-day notice, the director could begin that clock ticking whenever he, and the president, decide to.

Present Measures and Coming Conflicts

The director has declared major infrastructure projects in New York City and the midwestern metropolis are on hold, referring to required a review of questionable employment policies - a examination that he said can't take place during the closure.

He's also cancelled nearly $8bn in clean energy projects across 16 states, each supporting Harris, Trump's opponent, in last year's presidential race.

Democrats and federal worker unions have promised to fight these reductions in court and claimed that the president is issuing mostly bluffs to try to force them to giving up their opposition.

Numerous financial experts have noted that the White House reductions have been accompanied by other deficit-ballooning policies, which could undercut their attacks on the opposition for being the group favoring excessive spending.

"Republicans are increasing spending in different sectors and reducing revenue at the identical period," Brett House, an academic expert at the prestigious institution noted.

"The idea that they're committed to fiscal prudence is not supported by what they're doing."

Political Risks

Some Republicans in Congress have expressed concern that the visible enthusiasm with which the president is promoting director-mandated reductions could turn public opinion against them if the shutdown stretches on.

GOP officials have cautioned of the serious effects of the closure on public operations - as part of a strategy to portray Democrats as the ones to blame.

Engaging in this while celebrating the new ways the administration is slashing programmes could undermine that approach.

"The director is less politically aware than his boss," South Dakota Senator the senator, a member of the "Doge caucus", told the media outlet.

"We, as Republicans have never had so much ethical advantage on a spending measure in recent memory… I don't understand why we would waste it, which I think is the risk of being aggressive with executive power in this moment."

The North Carolina senator, a North Carolina senator who has decided against campaigning for re-election next year, warns that government representatives "need to be really careful" in how they announce additional reductions.

The Doge-directed layoffs and programme cuts were mostly disliked, according to public-opinion surveys, causing a drag on the president's approval ratings.

A reprise of that now risky.

As the expert stated, however, the administration, and Vought, may consider the future advantages as worth the immediate difficulties.

"For Russ, for myself, for anybody who's in the budget space, the nation faces financial crisis,"